As reading a Portfolio Budget Statement has never been my forte, I can only tell you after a little help that buried away in the statement for the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner [PDF 176KB] is an allocation of $10.604 million for 2013-14 compared to $10.764 million for the current year. Staff levels in the 80-85 range. Key performance indicators for timeliness remain unambitious, to use a term I've thrown around before, but you can only do what you can do. Adequate resourcing might make a difference.
-->
Program 1.1 key performance indicators
•
Australian Government agencies comply with the
requirements of the Information Publication Scheme and disclosure logs.
•
Principles on open public sector information
are promoted and understood across government.
•
OAIC merits review and complaint handling
processes meet timeliness and quality benchmarks.
•
Information and education products on privacy,
FOI and information policy meet stakeholder needs.
•
The
Information Advisory Committee and Privacy Advisory Committee are supported
in their role of providing advice to the OAIC.
|
|||||
2012–13
|
2014–15
|
2015–16
|
2016–17
|
||
Revised
|
2013–14
|
Forward
|
Forward
|
Forward
|
|
Key performance indicators
|
budget
|
Budget
|
year 1
|
year 2
|
year 3
|
Percentage of privacy complaints finalised within 12
months
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
Percentage of FOI complaints finalised within 12 months
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
Time taken from commencement to finalisation of audits/performance
assessments
|
6 months
|
6 months
|
6 months
|
6 months
|
6 months
|
Percentage of Information Commissioner reviews completed
in 12 months
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
80%
|
No comments:
Post a Comment