Seven months after its formation, the National Cabinet has made its way into the just published new edition of the Cabinet Handbook. (Pages 30-31) but is still to get a mention in the Government Directory
Anyone looking for an explanation about what makes the NC and a range of committees and groups that come within its scope (The Council on Federal Financial
Relations, any other committees "as required" that the NC establishes, and any National Cabinet
Reform Committees) part of the Federal Government Cabinet will be disappointed by the entry in the Handbook.
There is nothing in the National Cabinet section that adds anything to the Prime Minister's explanation that it's part of the Cabinet because he, presumably supported in this by the Premiers and First Ministers of the states and territories, decided it is, and say so.
According to the entry the "National Cabinet operates according to the longstanding Westminster principles of collective responsibility and solidarity."
Those principles as explained elsewhere in the Handbook (Page 9) are hard to reconcile with what has been on public display in the operation of the National Cabinet. For example:
- "(O)nce decisions are arrived at and announced they are supported by all ministers."
- "(A) decision of the Cabinet is binding on all members of the Government regardless of whether they were present when the decision was taken."
- "The aim is to reach some form of consensus so that the Prime Minister, as chair of the Cabinet, can summarise what the collective decision is for recording in the Cabinet minute.
- "Members of the Cabinet
must publicly support all Government
decisions made in the Cabinet,
even if they do not agree
- "Cabinet ministers cannot dissociate themselves from,
or repudiate the decisions of their Cabinet colleagues
unless they resign from the Cabinet."
- "It is the Prime Minister’s role as Chair of
the Cabinet, where necessary, to enforce Cabinet solidarity."
- Observance of the two principles is "entirely dependent on a commitment to three important operational values: consultation; confidentiality; and respect forthe primacy of Cabinet decisions."
Officials from Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, Australian Government Solicitor and Attorney General's Department were not able to explain more fully in Senate Estimates this week.
Senator Siewert .. Has.. the claim that national cabinet has the same provisions as cabinet, been raised by the states and agreed to by the states and territories?
Ms Foster (Deputy Secretary) : National cabinet was established by agreement of all first ministers, and they agreed that they wished national cabinet to be established as a subcommittee of the federal cabinet with all of the same provisions applying to it.
Senator SIEWERT: Under what legal basis is that? Just them agreeing to it doesn't make it so.
Ms Foster : Senator, as you know, cabinet operates by longstanding convention, and this committee was formed by the agreement of all the members under those provisions.
Prompting Senator Wong to comment
They're out there smashing each other publicly. Ministers generally don't do that. And it's not bound by consensus. Sorry, but I just think you shouldn't give evidence that's not correct. It might be the Prime Minister's line, but you should not give that evidence.
Later questioning saw officials explain the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee and
the COVID committee in preparing material for national cabinet consideration, are subject to the cabinet confidentiality provisions.
Answers to questions by the Australian Government Solicitor Mr Kingston bear a close relationship to a Yes Minister script. Those from the Secretary of the Department Mr Moraitis more closely resemble Sergeant Schultz- "I know nothing". Defies summarising. Full text below.
Senator Patrick is in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal challenging an FOI refusal of access to documents on the basis that national cabinet is covered by the cabinet document exemption.
In this post in June I suggested the National Cabinet lacked the essential characteristics of a cabinet that an earlier Tribunal decision described as relevant in deciding whether the exemption applies.
Senator Carr in estimates cited Constitutional law professor Cheryl Saunders saying, 'It's impossible for a meeting of the first ministers to operate according to the longstanding Westminster principles of collective responsibility as is claimed in the new Cabinet Handbook."
Time will tell.